Originally Posted by gigogreco
If a fighter was bigger heŽd lose speed, agility, be slower etc, he would fight in a completely different style.
if a fighter was smaller, heŽd be faster, more agile, less power etc and have a completely different style of fighting.
if all fighters were the exact same size, no one would have a ****ing clue about the outcome of a fight. P4p debates are like debating religion, pretty much ludicrous and without logic.
Originally Posted by Rob_Floyd
In boxing, it would have been a knockdown, but the word "floored" does make it sound worse than it was. Staggered is probably more fitting.
He was about as floored as Mayweather was against Judah.
Thank you Mr. Rob, for saying what I couldn't on the fly.
But, Haggis is on, in his own right. I think Chael Sonnen's knockdowns of Silva were legit, and on second thought anyone who is properly floored inside the cage is punched out 90% of the time.
For your time: