Originally Posted by dftaylor
So he's happy to fight the weaker of the two fighters out there? Sounds like a duck.
Ricky clearly feels he can get other fights and that the Broner fight will still be on the table. I'm not Ricky, neither are you. I'm sure they didn't just decide it wasn't worth it.
It's worth the wait if they get purse parity (which Burns deserves).
So what you are saying is Brook ducked Bradley, but Burns didn't duck Broner? How does that work?
What else has Burns got lined up? I'll ask you again, WHAT IS RICKY'S PATH???
Regarding Brook is was clear cut...... The Bradley fight was for "not great money" (according to Hearn) & loaded with options. We all knew that prior to TopRanks offer, Brook was heading for an IBF mandatory spot, and Marchroom followed that through.
Why has Burns chosen to not fight Broner? Because he has unfinished by business with Liam Walsh