View Single Post
Old 01-01-2013, 04:35 AM   #10
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 14,833
vCash: 129
Default Re: Pacquiao > Chavez

Rosario, Haugen, Camacho, Whitaker, and Taylor would all rule their respective divisions today, not much doubt about that.

Oscar at 147 would not; that version of Cotto at 147 probably wouldn't; JMM would at 126 and 130, but those are highly contested bouts; Margarito would not; his versions of Hatton and Morales (2) just might, but it's hard to say. Bradley is the most accomplished at 140 but would lose to Taylor and Whitaker.

Pacquiao has an impressive resume, but the contenders of Chavez's era, at least in the condition he fought them, look better.

Originally Posted by Chempasillo View Post
but guys, forget legacy and all that for one second. just look at the videos and watch 2 fighters of same weight and size, perfect p4p example, because there is realy no big difference in size and tell me manny doesn't look more impressiv, because down the line this is what it comes down to in a fist fight, is he stronger, is he faster and is he more durable and manny is surely superior than julio in those points mentioned.
You can's separate an evaluation of a fighter's skills from an evaluation of his resume. Being good and looking good are two different things. Manny looks more sensational than Marquez side by side, Leonard more gifted than Duran, Bute more skilled than Froch, etc.

Plus, look at Manny's loss to Morales. Chavez wouldn't be so quick on his feet to push Manny back with straight punches out of an upright stance, but his pressure would be no less grueling and his counters no less sharp.
Bogotazo is offline  Top
Reply With Quote