Originally Posted by Vidic
Not sure how you can say he was 'well matched'. He fought absolutely everybody who was ranked. Who was he 'well matched' against?
Who did he avoid?
Who did he cherrypick?
Frank Bruno was not past it. Michael Spinks was not past it. Neither was Tony Rucker, or James Smith, or Razor Ruddock
Larry Holmes was. But then Tyson made very short work of him so no complaints there
So tell me, how was he well matched
look at tysons fights up untill he actually won the title..all ****ing terrible thats where im getting the well matched from..
smith? already lost to the likes of witherspoon,tubs and marv frasier.
bruno?hahahahahahahahahahahaha **** me just no way..
spinks?ok in my eyes he was past it.but ive never really rated spinks
razor was a ****ing hype job..and dont even start me on tubbs..
not only do i think tyson was matched well.i think the 80s and early90s hw scence was very very weak talent wise..
my opinion tho..hence why i think hes one of the most over rated champions of all time...
dont get me wrong tho.still think he was a great boxer but very beatable.i just hate the dick sucking of some unicorn that he is suppsed to be...