View Single Post
Old 01-03-2013, 11:33 PM   #42
Sugar Nick
He's A Good Boy
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island,New York
Posts: 1,281
vCash: 88
Default Re: Shouldn't KO% come from dividing KO's over wins?

Originally Posted by dangerousity View Post
I agree with op. KO % is suppose to help determine how big a puncher someone is. If someone has 100% KO wins but only 50% wins, you will list him down as 50% KO. Doesn't sound like a big puncher, truth is he's a huge puncher, just cant box for ****.

Earnie Shavers according to boxrec has 77% KO ratio, pretty good but nothing amazing for the biggest HW puncher of all time. That's because he lost 14 times, truth is the guy has a 92% KO ratio in wins. The latter determines that he's a big puncher, a KO puncher.
Yeah I think you're one of the few who understand what I'm getting at.
Sugar Nick is offline  Top
Reply With Quote