View Single Post
Old 01-09-2013, 12:13 AM   #71
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,337
vCash: 500
Default Re: Creatine for boxers. Thoughts?

Originally Posted by wayneflint View Post
Right your quite the scientist.. No one corrects anyone in that thread, they all seem to have the general idea. However you failed to spot the study you posted only shows evidence supporting what ive been saying all along lol.. This is like banging your head against a brick wall like i said pages back its common knowledge the energy systems work in unison i never said or intended to imply otherwise, i always said PRIMARY energy system not ONLY.ill just go back to my origional post because we are getting confused as to what i said yet again. :-\

For me you would be better off worrying about the other energy systems if your feeling slugish on fight night as these systems are supplying easily 90%+ of the total energy used for each round and as you get further into the bout this % will rise, that was my point and it remains my point, clearly you dont care about reason anymore you just want to argue and try to pick minor faults in my text and take them out of context to seem like your scoring points while implying that my origional statements was wrong.

Now i see why everyone is calling you out to post evidence of you even training, it seems im not the only one thats tired of being
I agree that you'd be better off focusing on the other energy systems, but that's not the debate is it? You think the PCr system becomes useless after 10 seconds. You can't comprehend that energy systems are replenished, you have no idea how they interact.
Why don't you post video of you training? Even if you're Floyd Mayweather it won't change the fact that you are a ****ing moron who doesn't know what he's talking about. Talking to you is like banging my head against the wall, you've demonstrated how clueless you are and yet you still keep coming back. Now you've resorted to that old line 'let's see you training', as if it has some sort of relevance to what I'm saying.
dealt_with is online now  Top
Reply With Quote