Originally Posted by Bwgcolman
That's just one theory on how Australia was populated and it's the one that was put forward by social Darwinists to justify colonisation. Probably not the most accurate or suitable argument to put forward. Also the same theory has the tribes in Queensland belonging to the same Tasmanian Negroid group, and Hooper's tribe is from Queensland.
At least you could argue the points that are raised, instead of hiding behind misinformed rhetoric that has a racial undertow.
here. DNA evidence...today..