Originally Posted by LeBeave
I'm a big Froch fan but thought Dirrell was unlucky not to get the win.Dirrell gave it away by not engaging enough. I believe Froch has improved since their fight and would beat him easier in a rematch
This crap about beating the champ convincingly to win the belt is rubbish. If that was the case Sylvester should've held his belt against Geale going on that theory.
A fight should be judged rd by rd.... If it's a close rd and the scorer doesn't want to give it a 10-10 score maybe he can take into account who is the champ, but my personal opinion is judging each rd on it's own merits regardless of who is champ.
100 % agree. If Dirrell just scraps through to win a round then he ****in gets the round 10-9. You don't give the champ a round 10-9 is he didn't win it, that is corruption. If it's genuinely an even rd and you can't separate them then score it even you don't give it to the champ just because he is the champ.