Originally Posted by PowerPuncher
Why do you think this, have you studied the papers of the time? Dempsey was mocked for his level of competition, I think Willard would be if they held him to any standard whatsoever, he would be criticised for facing worse defences than Dempsey
Yes, on some of the reading I've done, I haven't noticed some abundance of writings on how ****py a champion he was. I'm sure there were negative press, but you're saying that was the norm, which is where I disagreement is. So, if you want to produce the overall consensus on him being viewed as a **** champion.. I would change my mind.