Originally Posted by Jamal Perkins
Watson beat a very basic version of Benn. That version of Benn was 35% complete. The Miami trained mid 1990 version of Benn was 70% complete. The Benn of 92-95 was 100% and most think he avenged the Eubanks fight only for it to be called a draw. and the benn of 95 destroys any version of Watson so yes he was better much better. Had the most power and handspeed and a very underrated unorthodox bob and weave defence allied with ferocity the other two didnt have.
i disagreee. benn was far m oore than 35% then 70%.
he was prob ablout 75% against watson and he lost convincingly. who is to say watson would not have improved and added to his skillset over time too?
and benn didnt carry his npower up much to super imo. lost that devastating edge to it. still heavy handed but not quite as devastating at middle and he never really cleaned anyone out at super