Originally Posted by Flea Man
Not true, Foreman 'lost' to Briggs and then Lennox beat Tyson. Or do you we actually think the way-past-it Bruno with an abysmal has tank was no.1 after beating McCall?
Anyway; Schulz was 'roiding. Foreman was an old man. Cut him some slack mayne.
Is that what you got from his post? Because I didn't.
Who are you anyway? Welcome
Interesting, I really get a gold grasp of the fight and your viewing experience from this.
no I reckon foreman was arguably number 1 after sparking MM. However after the close s****e with Schulz combined with Bowes showings against Golota and Tysons blitz of Bruno, Tyson moved to the head of the pack.
In no way shape or form was Briggs ever more than fringe top ten until the lyak victory.