Originally Posted by orriray59
I didn't say he'd be an animal later in life, I said right now, he's ranked the best in America and has won titles in different sports.
If the young lads in your gym are just as good as him, well then why haven't they accomplished the same things? Why aren't they winning various titles in various sports?
Let me again explain to you it is because AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME
they aren't as good as him. What don't you understand? Is this really difficult? Are you actually going to argue that some random kids in your local gym are just as good as the #1 in the USA?
He's ranked "best in America".... so ****ing what?? Doesn't the WBA rank Amir Khan ahead of Lucas Matthysse? Does that mean I must automatically consider Khan superior to Lucas??
Rankings are subjective, are they not??