Re: ike ibeabuchi vs samuel peter
There are no former Olympians who become professional major beltholders who are shit. Peter is a strong-chinned, strong-punching slugger who polished up a little bit and regressed during his career. Nothing special, but certainly not shit. That's uncalled for. He was one of the top fighters in his division in the world at one point. Even in a poor era that is far from shit. Ike was simply better, however, and overcame two fighters better and more proven than Samuel and he's seen better than Sam had and likely wouldn't be trouble so much by him, best for best. I'd take the nutter by 6-8 stoppage.