Originally Posted by Meow
In the context of Vitali retiring Lewis and Vitali being 41 and still fighting while Lewis prematurely retired at 37 makes it funny.
Are you ignoring the 4 years Vitaly was retired rather than facing Rahman?
Or did mandatory challenger Vitaly retire Lewis, but mandatory challenger Rahman didn't retire Vitaly?
Personally I find watching Vitaly fight guys like Briggs, Charr etc ghastly.
Honestly, he'd be better off retired.