Originally Posted by Badbot
Did VADA not screw up those two times by not releasing all the info from start ?
All i saw was "Berto has tested positive !!!!!" and then it was suddenly "Oh, it was just trace amounts of something insignificant."
But to refuse extra testing ?
They didn't actually screw up.
They found the trace amount wich could mean it was almost flushed out or mean he used another substance as a cover.
It could also mean het ate something contaminated.
Same thing happened to a Spanish cyclist who got suspended for 2 years after a juridical battle.