Originally Posted by Berliner
Charr is not a bum. He may not be the greatest fighter. But he is good. Especially he is good enough for Haye who himself did nothing great at heavyweight.
Originally Posted by LuckyLuke
Charr was never hurt in that fight! You can say what you want about Charrs performance but he was nevver hurt.
And why in hell is Charr not a worthy fight for Haye? Is Haye a unified worldchampion? No. Is Haye anything special? No! Is Haye the best HW besides a Klitschko? No he dindt prove that!
So why in hell is Charr not a worthy fight for Haye?
Of course, Haye will be the odds-on favorite, but that's not the point.
Charr deserves this opportunity, and he will likely be a much tougher opponent than the absurdly over-hyped Chisora was. If Haye beats Charr convincingly, even Haye's worst critics will have to give him some credit.