View Single Post
Old 07-29-2007, 04:28 PM   #25
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 11,628
vCash: 1186
Default Re: Ranking fighters

Originally Posted by dmille
Ratings are merely opinion based, there I agree. But if one rates a fighter at 5 and the other rates him at 50 (either within his prime/natural weight division or pound-for-pound); one of them is wrong.

And you may not get the same 10 middleweights everytime, but the total number of fighters overall will not be 1000 or even 100. The same names will keep being cited.
Fair points... but ultimately your opinion, which was my point.

Opinions on a hypothesis that is unlikely to ever happen (eg: If Jimmy Wilde fought Lennox Lewis at the same weight; Wilde would win) cannot be proven right or wrong.
TBooze is offline  Top
Reply With Quote