Boxing News 24 Forum - View Single Post - Henry Armstrong vs Stanley Ketchel in WW Havoc

FlatNose · 06-22-2007, 09:26 AM

Stans too big for Henry.Thats why Hammering Hank lost to Zivic.Fritzie wasn't near as talented or energetic as Armstrong, but was too big and strong and wore down Armstrong in close.Fritzie was a big puncher (81 career knockouts), but Ketchell was even bigger , stronger, and a more lethal hitter.Ketchell knocked down Jack Johnson, so imagine what that same punch would do to a 5'3" Armstrong.

06-22-2007, 09:26 AM	#2
FlatNose Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 3,406 vCash: 1000	Re: Henry Armstrong vs Stanley Ketchel in WW Havoc Stans too big for Henry.Thats why Hammering Hank lost to Zivic.Fritzie wasn't near as talented or energetic as Armstrong, but was too big and strong and wore down Armstrong in close.Fritzie was a big puncher (81 career knockouts), but Ketchell was even bigger , stronger, and a more lethal hitter.Ketchell knocked down Jack Johnson, so imagine what that same punch would do to a 5'3" Armstrong.
Top