Originally Posted by mr. magoo
True to some extent,
Though I think on ESB and other various forums, he's starting to regain recognition as one of boxing's best. Another poster name Marciano_Frazier, said it best when he pointed out that Charles commonly makes most people's top 20 list, and rightfully so.. I think traditionally, the problem was that Charles resume requires a further degree of study as opposed to someone with a flashy record and loads of carisma, in order to better appreciate his accomplishments.
His record from 1946-1951 is something else. His grace, skill and ability on film is what wins me over to Charles though