Originally Posted by JohnThomas1
Holmes wasn't even within seeing distance of prime Bummy. Barely a shell of the fighter he once was, and don't forget he still beat Spinks in the rematch, regardless of impotent judging. We may as well look at the last two Walcott fights and Rex Layne as well for a comparison.
No thats not a fair comparison...Holmes still had some left and the 2nd fight was closer but I did not think Holmes won, we been down that road before...Spinks took Holmes title, Holmes did not take his. I think Charles was a far superior fighter than Spinks @ 175 and Heavyweight, Charles brought so much more to the table.