Originally Posted by Illmatic
Belts mean nothing and there will ALWAYS be other people with belts. Was Tszyu not the man when they stripped him of the WBA belt?
Is Hatton not the man at 140 b/c Witter has a belt?
Was Lewis not the champ b/c Ruiz had a belt?
And he won all those other belts, but lost them b/c of dumbass title politics, just like what happened to Tszyu, Dairus M and countless others
Exactly - Tszyu won all of the belts to become "Undisputed". What happened after was irrelevant.
Hatton may be "the man" in many people's opinion (including mine) but he is NOT "Undisputed Champ" while others hold belts until he unifies them.
Lewis was Undisputed because he unified the belts and didn't lose them in the ring.