Originally Posted by Luigi1985
Amsterdam, donīt switch words. I didnīt write that Bivins would beat him, I said that he would have a chance, thatīs a big difference...
But what I don't get is how you pick Joe over James Toney and claim it would be quite clear, but then act as if **** Tiger and Bivins are less clear.
All of the purists even agreed that Calzaghe has a nasty stylistic advantage over Tiger, just like he does over the defensively tentative counter puncher in James Toney(against speed). I think Toney is several steps up in terms of ability and skill from Tiger or Bivins.