Re: The H2H argument of the Jermain Taylor apologist.
Yeah, I think i agree with ya. Before Taylor fought Hops in '05 he didnt have big names on his resume, with maybe the exception of Raul Marquez (who was a fringe contender anyway) but he beat Hops (however contraversial), so now we have Pavlik, and people say well Jermain has fought better fighters, yeah well Pavlik has more professional fights is a better fighter technically, and has a reach and power advantage over Taylor. Lastly Taylor has looked horrible, and hes gotten this far on skill but skill can only get you so far, after a while, fighters have to learn to mix it up and show better discipline that what Taylor has shown. I dont think Taylor will win, and his fans should realize that.