Thread: Doug Jones
View Single Post
Old 09-17-2009, 01:46 PM   #33
My2Sense
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,971
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Doug Jones

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
Terver beat every top 175 of his time except michalczewski (who didn't face roy either , so maybe it's michalczewski's fault) , you have boxrec too , you don't need that long list from me .
Dawson? Hopkins? Adamek? Calzaghe? In each case he either lost clearly to them or didn't fight them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
johnson's resume doesn't make tarver look medicore at all.
he just had more fights. not more quality fights.
What do you define as "quality fights"?

Johnson had a total of nine fights against Charles, Moore, Walcott, Bivins, and Pastrano - and that's just counting the Hall of Famers, not the host of other top contenders he beat.

What do you consider Tarver's "quality fights"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
his wins were decisive , his losses controversial and close and never as decisive as their rematches , except dawson when tarver was 40-41.
His losses to Hopkins, Harding, and Dawson were neither controversial nor close.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
why should i care about Henry Hall, Jimmy Slade, Paul Andrews, Wayne Bethea, Arturo Godoy, Gustav Scholz, Leonard Morrow, etc. ?
Because you said you care about guys like Woods, Griffin, Harmon, "Benguesmia", etc., who were no better than that bunch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
their records prove what i said.
Their records show that Johnson did better against Roy, Dawson, and Harding than Tarver did, in addition to being 1-1 against him. So no, their records do not prove what you said.
My2Sense is offline  Top
Reply With Quote