Originally Posted by red cobra
Yes, you're right about Paul Anderson..he had a brief boxing career, but had to be the strongest, technically anyway.
The thing about Foreman when he fought Norton...Norton had the better build in terms of classic bodybuilding, and their standards, but Foreman was more massive (NOT fat), and looked STRONGER than Norton.
Yes, it looked like he quite easily imposed his physicality on Norton, and he was perhaps the only one of that generation of HWs who could do that.
And he was even stronger during his second career. He was just as physically imposing then, but against bigger and stronger HWs.