Originally Posted by gooners!!
I love it the way Tyson fans gloss over the fact that Holyfield was 34 at the time and has been in many many wars, he was also coming off some terrible performances against Moorer and Bowe, but lets not ruin a good story eh.
Tyson was in better shape than Holyfield to win that fight, he lost because Holyfield was a better fighter.
Did the version of Moorer that first beat Holyfield always have Holyfield's number?
Did a young Rid**** Bowe in the first fight of their trilogy always have Holyfield's number?
Was Holyfield **** in those fights or were Moorer and Bowe really that good?
Put it that way, it's imponderable.