Originally Posted by OLD FOGEY
My definition is which fighter is more likely to produce knockouts in the ring. I'm not interested in theoretical power, as it can't be measured. The record tells us at least something about who can score knockouts in the ring.
I understood your argument. I'm responding more to the people who like to point live in the theoretical world.
Something similar to this came up in the Foreman v. Lewis thread. Some people wanted to point to a couple punches as evidence that Lewis hit as hard as Foreman. It wasn't a meritable argument.