Originally Posted by anarci
I agree with you and im very aware of Tigers resume who he beat and his career,level of comp etc.
What a Rock you had good points but overall Mayweather,Jones,Napoloes,Burley were all better fighters than Tiger simple as that.
And thats why I said I have them higher then Tiger anarci..besides Floyd who I only have slightly behind.
But I cant agree with PP rubbishing Tiger's resume because of a couple of losses to very good fighters that Im not totally convinced he really has even looked into.
I dont think its as simple as that anyway...Tiger's resume is deep and well stacked..Much more so then Mayweathers at the very least. What a fighter might be capable of and what he actually did are two different things.