Originally Posted by Decebal
You are right...he is very good...he makes my Top 6-7...but he talks even better than the sixth/seventh best fighter, that's for sure. He did look impressive against Tatevosyam, but he wouldn't get be able to look so good against a better fighter who would counterpunch better, use the jab more effectively, move better in the ring and find better angles and work faster...
I'm not entirely convinced he's completely genuine in his arrogance, rather than angering me, he amuses me with his pantomime villainry. Remember Eubank was 'box office' but not because people wanted to see him win.