Originally Posted by My2Sense
Not really, there's more that two fighters in history that deserve to be rated over him.
No they don't. Plenty of people have always rated Saddler there or at least tied with Pep for that spot.
Charles and Duran have credentials far outside of just being the possible best in a particular weight class.
If Pep isn't the #1 FW of all time, then what is the case for making him the #3 P4P fighter ever?
Tracy callis and cox's corner rate Armstrong as the #1 FW, does he fit in at all??? Although he was ahead of Pep in Sugars list as well