Originally Posted by Godfather
That's fair enough if you consider everyone in a top 100 list to be ATG's. I haven't got a p4p list but I reckon I'd only consider the top 35/40 to be ATG's. If you have too many the term becomes meaningless.
I don't rank guys like Chavez, Saddler, Griffith, Arguello, Hearns, Marciano, Spinks, Pacquiao, Sanchez, Tiger, Harada, etc. etc. in that range. Would you consider them all time greats? I certainly would. I think there were most certainly up to 100 fighters I'd consider all time greats. In a sport ranging from 8 to 17 weight classes spanning a total of up to 130 years, I hardly think that's a preposterous position to hold.