View Single Post
Old 10-24-2010, 05:00 AM   #15
Dominating a decade
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 15,682
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies

Originally Posted by Sakura View Post
You gave more points Pulev than Helenius. Helenius has been sparring more dominant fighter as i know, but otherwise good job
Here's the thing. None of young guns have beaten a top 10 heavy, so it is difficult to tell who is the best among Pulev, Helenius, or Glazkov.

I do think Pulev has much better speed, and better athleticism and skills in comparison to Helenius. Pulev at 6'4" 1/2 is a big man too. Helenius is a little stiff, but my guess hits harder and take the better punch in comparison to Pulev. Glalzkov is only 6'3", but I think he takes the best punch of the three, hits a little harder than Pulev, and is quicker than Helenius. As an Amateur, Glazkov was the highest rated of the three. Who is the best man? Hard to say for now!

I don't think Pulev, Helenius, or Glazkov are going to be aces capable of trumping the deck, but each of them has the potential to become a king once the Klitschko's are gone.
Mendoza is offline  Top
Reply With Quote