View Single Post
Old 07-04-2007, 02:52 PM   #35
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 24,156
vCash: 1000
Default Re: So what exactly is wrong with Nat Fleischer's top 10 heavyweight list?

Originally Posted by TBooze
It does when you claiming a perfect pro career.
You can loose a thousand amateur fights and still have a perfect pro career. There is no contradiction.

Marciano is saying I never loss a fight from March 1947 onwards, that is simply not true.
Did he ever make the claim that he never lost a fight either amateur or profesional during this period?

Sure the likes of Armstrong etc did the same thing, but unlike the Rock their greatness is not based on a statistical abnormality.
A statistical abnormality that he atained on his merits.
janitor is offline  Top
Reply With Quote