View Single Post
Old 07-04-2007, 03:31 PM   #42
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,705
vCash: 1000
Default Re: So what exactly is wrong with Nat Fleischer's top 10 heavyweight list?

Originally Posted by TBooze
Point one; of course
OK. So he was unbeaten as a profesional fighter but not as an amateur fighter or pool player or competitive eater.

Point two; Marciano claimed to be unbeaten from March 1947.
Did he specificaly claim that he was unbeaten as an amateur in this period?

If not then I don't have a problem.

Point three; Well no, as well as Wallace, the first LaStarza fight was a draw...
It was scored as a win for Marciano. Therfore it is a win.
janitor is online now  Top
Reply With Quote