View Single Post
Old 07-04-2007, 04:01 PM   #46
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 26,053
vCash: 1000
Default Re: So what exactly is wrong with Nat Fleischer's top 10 heavyweight list?

Originally Posted by Sonny's jab
Braddock, Carnera and Baer aren't necessarily better than the guys Dempsey beat. They were poor champions. Poor champions aren't automatically better than ordinary or good contenders.
I would argue that Max Schmeling and Joe Walcott were better than anybody Dempsey beat.

janitor is offline  Top
Reply With Quote