Originally Posted by Senya13
Perhaps because Leonard with his handspeed and angles, was less predictable in his offense, and thus his punches were harder to deal with than predictable punches of Hearns?
Hey, if that's what floats your boat go for ya life. The rest of the world knows Hearns and Leonard aren't even comparable for power or KO potential. Leonard's lesser predictability and all the rest of the jargon sure showed in their comparative battles vs Duran, not to mention others. I also remember you telling me Hearn's right hand really wasn't that good. I mean, how hte heck can i debate vs this sort of stuff.