View Single Post
Old 03-03-2011, 10:43 AM   #61
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lennox lewis vs George Foreman - Physical strength

Originally Posted by Jorodz View Post
size and weight don't mean ****. as has been said before, being bigger by a few pounds does not mean stronger.

ken norton was "bigger" than holyfield and admitted he had nowhere near holy's physical strength

moongoose said carnera, which may be true, but technically butterbean is bigger than all the heavyweight champs but is he really stronger?

Foreman proved his physical strength as part of his style: he pushed mother****ers back like they were children.

Lewis got into sloppy wars with mercer and rahman precisely because he COULDN'T do this and couldn't create the distance he wanted

minute 5:19

and i agree, the weight is not matter, then valuev is the strongest ever....
Reply With Quote