Originally Posted by FORSTER
And delisle fought clinton woods for 12 rounds nearly 3 years before he met green
.Thats the only reason he lasted.He was probably at his peak.
Id say at 35 years old mate with 6 losses when he met green he was left over stale bread.When delisle met woods again it didnt go 6 rounds.
So yes i still say neivas is better than delisle and murdoch.
Murdoch has lost seven fights too mate.
Neivas has more k.o's and only 1 loss.
You do realise Green faced Delisle on more than one occasion the first when he also knocked him out being before Delisle was 35 and met Woods for the 1st time, or did that just happen to slip your knowledge "Mr Facts"
, jesus he is still trying to make Nievas out as being a good opponent...kill yourself.