|
|
|
#4 |
|
GTMSBT Gold Member
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Team Ireland manor. Waiting for Pab to make the fucking challenge.
Posts: 25,467
vCash: 271 |
Not close.
Most people probably couldn't name the heavyweight champ other than 'the big russian guy?'. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 694
vCash: 516 |
Lol. It used to be back when you knew who the big boss was. If you asked somebody in the 60's who was the heavyweight champ they'd say Muhammad Ali or Sonny Liston.
Now, a random person off the street either wouldn't be able to identify who really was the champion, and if they did it would probably come out as "Oh yeah, the 7 foot tall Russian brother. Or was it that English black guy?" You see? You've got Holyfield, the Klitschko brothers, and before the second of July, Haye!? There's too many belts. There should be one champion per weight class, and the #1 contender becomes the mandatory by defeating the #2 contender, etc. EDIT: And as for the topic title, no, the heavyweight belt isn't the greatest sporting title. It used to be though. The heavyweight champ back in say, the 1900's - 1980's was the man. He was the boss. The biggest, meanest, strongest man on the planet. You didn't fuck with him. He was a bad ass. Guys like Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Jefferies, Johnson, Holmes, Tyson, Liston, etc. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,770
vCash: 685 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|