boxing
Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


View Poll Results: Mayweather vs. Pacquiao is now meaningless?
Agree 421 43.95%
Disagree 537 56.05%
Voters: 958. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-10-2011, 06:52 PM   #1531
Blizz42
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,252
vCash: 500
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
Correction: Why brawl when you dont have the ability or the self beleif or guts to?
Now we all know who we're arguing with ****en pathetic.
Blizz42 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-10-2011, 06:55 PM   #1532
Blizz42
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,252
vCash: 500
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Floyd learned from his dad and uncle and combined both styles. Do you think Floyd fought one way his entire career???
Blizz42 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:08 PM   #1533
bballchump11
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 30,851
vCash: 75
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
Correction: Why brawl when you dont have the ability or the self beleif or guts to?
Why do you talk down on a fighter for using defense?
bballchump11 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:15 PM   #1534
Blizz42
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,252
vCash: 500
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bballchump11 View Post
Why do you talk down on a fighter for using defense?
Don't look at it that way. He's clueless and ****ed. His opinion from Floyds ppvs to how Floyd fights is just to **** you off more than anything because he's frustrated There is no basis to any of his points. Floyd not having self belief or guts, lmao. Come on bball.
Blizz42 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:16 PM   #1535
Bazooka
Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 22,203
vCash: 75
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blizz42 View Post
This is the answer of a mentally beaten boxing fan ****en excuse maker. ****en Rockem, Sockem robot fan
Wrong this is the response of someone who has no leg to stand on...
Bazooka is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:17 PM   #1536
Bazooka
Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 22,203
vCash: 75
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bballchump11 View Post
Why do you talk down on a fighter for using defense?
I am not talking him down I am just saying if you want to talk versatility Floyd knows one way.......... Box (Defensive)

Manny knows how to Box and how to bang it out if need be... Floyd just wont do that even when its clear he has a dead man in front of him such as Baldimor
Bazooka is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:20 PM   #1537
Blizz42
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,252
vCash: 500
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
Wrong this is the response of someone who has no leg to stand on...
Yo, you're killing me
Blizz42 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:21 PM   #1538
Blizz42
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,252
vCash: 500
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
I am not talking him down I am just saying if you want to talk versatility Floyd knows one way.......... Box (Defensive)

Manny knows how to Box and how to bang it out if need be... Floyd just wont do that even when its clear he has a dead man in front of him such as Baldimor
Classic
Blizz42 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:30 PM   #1539
sdsfinest22
Pound 4 Pound
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 619 Sunny SD
Posts: 18,870
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
Correction: Why brawl when you dont have the ability or the self beleif or guts to?
Bazooka that would defeat the point of the actual "sport"...

the point is to hit and not get hit..

IF you have the SKILL to hit the guy W/OUT getting hit then your "playing the game right"

IS A RUNNING BACK GONNA RUN AWAY FROM THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE AND LOSE YARDS SO HE CAN MAKE IT MORE INTERESTING OR EXCITING OR WHATEVER WE WANNA CALL IT??

I DONT THINK SO CUZ THE POINT OF THE SPORT IS TO MOVE FORWARD..

JUST AS THE POINT OF BOXING IS TO HIT AND NOT GET HIT...

I see what your saying and I SEE THE POINT YOUR TRYING TO MAKE..

Problem is that it goes against "the object of the game"
sdsfinest22 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:49 PM   #1540
PH|LLA
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YUL
Posts: 38,153
vCash: 5685
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdsfinest22 View Post
Bazooka that would defeat the point of the actual "sport"...

the point is to hit and not get hit..

IF you have the SKILL to hit the guy W/OUT getting hit then your "playing the game right"

IS A RUNNING BACK GONNA RUN AWAY FROM THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE AND LOSE YARDS SO HE CAN MAKE IT MORE INTERESTING OR EXCITING OR WHATEVER WE WANNA CALL IT??

I DONT THINK SO CUZ THE POINT OF THE SPORT IS TO MOVE FORWARD..

JUST AS THE POINT OF BOXING IS TO HIT AND NOT GET HIT...

I see what your saying and I SEE THE POINT YOUR TRYING TO MAKE..

Problem is that it goes against "the object of the game"
See it from another point of view.

Floyd doesn't wanna brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 4 punches on this guy and he only lands 1 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

Pac wants to brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 20 punches on this guy and he lands 5 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

So both ways work. Even if Floyd only gets hit once, he only hits his opponent 4 times. Pac gets hit 5 times, but he is hitting his opponent with 20 punches. And he knows he can dish it out better than anyone else.

Pac has no reason NOT to brawl. But sometimes he doesn't do it cause he can win either way. Pac can go toe to toe with anyone in the sport. He can also outbox a whole ****load of people. Floyd can't really go toe to toe with fighters who are good at it.
PH|LLA is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 07:57 PM   #1541
sdsfinest22
Pound 4 Pound
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 619 Sunny SD
Posts: 18,870
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PH|LLA View Post
See it from another point of view.

Floyd doesn't wanna brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 4 punches on this guy and he only lands 1 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

Pac wants to brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 20 punches on this guy and he lands 5 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

So both ways work. Even if Floyd only gets hit once, he only hits his opponent 4 times. Pac gets hit 5 times, but he is hitting his opponent with 20 punches. And he knows he can dish it out better than anyone else.

Pac has no reason NOT to brawl. But sometimes he doesn't do it cause he can win either way. Pac can go toe to toe with anyone in the sport. He can also outbox a whole ****load of people. Floyd can't really go toe to toe with fighters who are good at it.


I do see it at his point of view..I said it in the post..I see exactly what he is trying to say..

but to do that would be taking away from the actual sport of it..

I mean are the colts gonna run the ball all the time when they can throw and be successful..

I see exactly what your saying....It just makes 0 sense to go "away" from the point of the actual game IF you don't have to...

I should say the Colts should quit throwing then...

Good debate though but I dont see it like that at all.

Your asking the athlete (or wondering if the athlete actually can) to go away from the entire point of the sport..to change the process "on purpose" in winning the game..

That is not what you do and it goes against the entire point of the sport itself...
sdsfinest22 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 08:00 PM   #1542
sdsfinest22
Pound 4 Pound
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 619 Sunny SD
Posts: 18,870
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

back to boxing..

Floyd PROVED his versatility when he showed he can fight "hurt"

Go watch round 2 of Mosley-Mayweather...

I HAVE NEVER SEEN A FIGHTER "FIGHT HURT" THE WAY FLOYD DID..

ITS AS IF HE HAS DRILLS IN CAMP TO LITERALLY PRACTICE DIFFERENT POSITIONS HE MIGHT BE IN SUCH AS BEING HURT AND HE EXECUTED THOSE PLANS IN THE REAL FIGHT ("YOU FIGHT THE WAY YOU TRAIN").........

O WAIT, HE DOES HAVE THOSE DRILLS...

Floyd is more versatile than Manny and it shows within his fight game.
sdsfinest22 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 08:01 PM   #1543
Blizz42
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,252
vCash: 500
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PH|LLA View Post
See it from another point of view.

Floyd doesn't wanna brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 4 punches on this guy and he only lands 1 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

Pac wants to brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 20 punches on this guy and he lands 5 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

So both ways work. Even if Floyd only gets hit once, he only hits his opponent 4 times. Pac gets hit 5 times, but he is hitting his opponent with 20 punches. And he knows he can dish it out better than anyone else.

Pac has no reason NOT to brawl. But sometimes he doesn't do it cause he can win either way. Pac can go toe to toe with anyone in the sport. He can also outbox a whole ****load of people. Floyd can't really go toe to toe with fighters who are good at it.
This is why you're looked at as a ****en pac**** with a **** opinion
Blizz42 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 08:20 PM   #1544
sdsfinest22
Pound 4 Pound
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 619 Sunny SD
Posts: 18,870
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PH|LLA View Post
See it from another point of view.

Floyd doesn't wanna brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 4 punches on this guy and he only lands 1 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

Pac wants to brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 20 punches on this guy and he lands 5 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

So both ways work. Even if Floyd only gets hit once, he only hits his opponent 4 times. Pac gets hit 5 times, but he is hitting his opponent with 20 punches. And he knows he can dish it out better than anyone else.

Pac has no reason NOT to brawl. But sometimes he doesn't do it cause he can win either way. Pac can go toe to toe with anyone in the sport. He can also outbox a whole ****load of people. Floyd can't really go toe to toe with fighters who are good at it.
I actually disagree with alot of this Philla..

I have been in the ring many times and it isn't as easy as how u put it, AND IT IS NOT NEARLY THAT SIMPLE..(REFERENCING PARAGRAPHS 1-3

LOL IF ONLY IT WERE...
sdsfinest22 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 08:26 PM   #1545
Alo2006
R.I.P Sean Taylor
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,876
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Is this a serious question? Pac would even tell u the answer is Mayweather.
Alo2006 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2015