40 year old Vitali VS 30 year old Tyson

[Foreman Hook]

2011 Vitali VS 1996 Tyson.

Vitali, 242lbs, 6′ 7½″ , 80inch reach



VS

Tyson, 222lbs, 5'10″ , 71inch reach



Foreman Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!

[SenorRamirez]

Tyson by TKO,klitcko get stoped by cuts

[Jorodz]

Originally Posted by Foreman Hook

2011 Vitali VS 1996 Tyson.

Vitali, 242lbs, 6′ 7½″ , 80inch reach



VS

Tyson, 222lbs, 5'10″ , 71inch reach

i love ya hook and i know where you're leaning on this one

i'm gonna consider this one a bit. watching vitali's form last night makes me wonder how well his generalship works against all time greats. he can dictate the texture of a fight like few in history

[PowerPuncher]

Arreola landed on Vitali, Tyson would get past the jab and land time and again. The difference in speed is time warpish here and Tyson lands his best time and again. Tyson's style would expose the low hands leaning back style of defense in the most devastating way

TYson KO mid rounds

[lepinthehood]

klitchko wouldnt be able to get out of trouble, lacksfootwork and will be just a big target for tyson when he slips he jab. vitalis might hold up for a while though

[The Mongoose]

96 Tyson would be better than anyone Vitali fought but he still doesn't have the hops, movement, or stamina to get the job done. His overhand right would be crashing into Vitali's arm, and he wouldn't be able to time over the top with his left consistently. After the mid rounds, Tyson would be a sitting duck like he was against Holyfield, eating countless flush shots and sadly being stopped on his feet.

He would brusie Vitali's body in the clinch but Tyson was never one to stick with that or build from it to a finish. Tyson of the late 80s, might be up for the task though, so much movement and speed in the early rounds, with those jumping shots possible catching Vitali as he leans in.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSb4-ejQavw[/ame]

[Mr Applebee]

It would be almost as one sided as last nights fight, the sentimentalists on this site do my fu*king head in!!

[Jorodz]

Originally Posted by Mr Applebee

It would be almost as one sided as last nights fight, the sentimentalists on this site do my fu*king head in!!

with respect, i completely disagree.

[FJAY360]

Originally Posted by Mr Applebee

It would be almost as one sided as last nights fight, the sentimentalists on this site do my fu*king head in!!

What you're basically saying is that Adamek is on the same level of Tyson? Too much is being made of last nights performance, though Vitali dominated Adamek was/is never any good at HW, he has 0 power which didn't even give him a punchers chance.

This could go either way, if Tyson rushes him early and works to the body then he could slow Vitali down in the later rounds but if Tyson goes headhunting I think Vitali would find a rhythm and score a late Tko/ UD

[Blood Green]

a lot of delusions in this thread. Tyson would get his ass kicked.

[DDDUUDDDEE]

Tyson T/KO.

It looks like a more civilised Dempsey-Willard (lasts a bit longer too).

[tommygun711]

Originally Posted by Mr Applebee

It would be almost as one sided as last nights fight, the sentimentalists on this site do my fu*king head in!!

you delusional dumbfuck there's no way Adamek is on the level of Tyson

[crippet]

I dont think the Tysonistas understand that the question is about a 30 year old Tyson.

I think a 40 year old Vitali would do to him pretty much what Holyfield did to him

[RoosterC]

Any version of Vitali beats Tyson with ease. Tyson was terrible against tall fighters and even worse against great fighters....Tyson lost to every great fighter he fought.

[PowerPuncher]

Originally Posted by crippet

I dont think the Tysonistas understand that the question is about a 30 year old Tyson.

I think a 40 year old Vitali would do to him pretty much what Holyfield did to him

Bruno is arguably as good as 40yo Vitali and look what happened there, Golota is a little similar and what happened there with an older Tyson?