|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,789
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
You have a point In more ways than one. But think of it like this; one nutter banging on about the Wallace fight is never going to change anything; thus even using emoticons is not going to vent my fustration. But it is fun....
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,789
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,734
vCash: 785 |
Quote:
You are telling all of us that a kid with barely any good amateur background to even get noticed and fighting as a pro in the corners of Mexico in his 10th or 12th fight, which is when the disputed decision happened, was already under Don King's wing? Come on. ![]() Back to reality. Chavez signed with Don King after his 40th+ fight in Los Angeles. The DQ loss in 1981 was overturned a day after the fight. /END OF THREAD Last edited by 4Rounder; 02-05-2008 at 05:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,789
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
But then Tyson loses his championship and serves some jail time, and DKP needs a new hero, with IHO, a great story. Chavez was the hero, but with an '0' he was also the great story as well, because DKP could spin the journey to 100 and 0. Being told a lie about a fighter being undefeated when he was not, is significant when he is fronting the most powerful promotion in boxing. We the fans deserve better. Chavez was great, an amazing fighting machine, he did not need an '0' to get that across. |
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,086
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|