Quote:
Originally Posted by megavolt
Of course different viewers will see it diffeent ways, I have it controversial to Whitaker but I can see where the robbery could have come from, but a W is still listed as a W. but you're digressing from the main point
Is it because you can't find a way to defend Floyd? Looks like it. Keep sucking his nuts
|
You have mentioned nothing that would put any of those guys ahead of Mayweather resume wise.
You list Olivareswho was at 126 as being apart of Arguello's legacy at 130.
Then you go on to say Chavez beat Lockridge, Roger Mayweather, and Ramirez then claim in good conscience that Ramirez beat Pernell Whitaker.
That was a robbery nobody but the judges though Ramirez won that night. It was a complete schooling. At best you can give him 3 rounds. You drunk ass bum ass Pactard. Fucking fetching nickels out of the gutter then try and talk boxing.