|
|
|
#16 |
|
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,476
vCash: 1000 |
I don't thik you're serious or doubt how you can be ... you are comparing the slow, telegraphed , single handed punching of Max Baer to the blazing fast, superbly conditioned, two handed power of Mike Tyson ... can we get real ...? Perhaps you can tell me the fight where Ber fought anyone larger and stronger than him with at least equal power and chin ? Baer was a colorful character and a big puncher against cruiserweights ... maybe even a big puncher all time but in my book he cut his bones as the much bigger, stronger and harder punching man and he would hold none of those advantages against Smith. If it is a slugfest it is a very interesting fight ... |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,476
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I didn't even project that Max would outslug James, only that he'd outwork him if this went to the final bell. He was typically far more relaxed in the ring than Smith. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Posts: 12,511
vCash: 1000 |
I'm going with smith... Baer may have the better record, but at the same time, he also wasn't fighting men like Holmes, Witherspoon and Bruno with less than 17 fights.
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 0 |
I could fight Witherspoon, Holmes and Bruno in my first three fights. And I guess that makes me better than both Bonecrusher and Baer in your theory then, as I am fighting all three with less than FOUR fights experience...
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|