|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,271
vCash: 90 |
Quote:
![]() How do you know Winky will carry his skills up to LHW? I'd like to see him fight a real LHW and prove it. Or even a real SMW for a start. I don't think Winky is a pushover. And I think this would be a good fight at middleweight. It's just a cheek to call it anything else above a middleweight fight. The catchweight is just a gentlemans agreement to nut have to dry out to make weight IMO. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,395
vCash: 2036 |
We will know the value of a Wright win in the first round of the fight.
If Hopkins looks like he has no legs or has deteriorated then Winky should not get full credit for the win. |
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kessler-Beyer - Get ready to rumble!
Posts: 267
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong. The fight does make sense for both of them in a risk/reward sense - but that doesn't mean the fans shouldn't aspire to get some real fights on. Hopkins and Winky should get it over with and take on Dawson and Erdei if they want to stay at LHW. If they did that - THEN there would be somethoing on the line! because Dawson IS NOT a good risk/reward scenario for either, BUT that is exactly what makes it interesting. Pac should stop doing the same boring thing with Barrera and Morales forever and ever. Apparently it matters little who wins or looses becasue they just make a rematch for ever. Good risk/reward for Pac, but frankly getting boring for the fans. Take on a redhot Valero who is waiting for some action. Bad risk/reward for Pac maybe, but great reward for the fans. Finally something on the line. Move on, give us good fights. |
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Monzon-like
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 8,800
vCash: 484 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,533
vCash: 950 |
If Floyd doesn't retire - no, he'll be no. 2.
If Floyd retires - very good chance and a good argument can be made. Of course this all depends on Winky BEATING Hopkins |
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,506
vCash: 1000 |
I'm tired of people saying Winky beat Taylor. He blew the fight by doing a "De La Hoya" in the 11th and 12th rounds. Neither one of them did enough to win and him not fighting Taylor again makes him look bad.
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
ESB good-looking member
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: the few, the proud, the Philippines
Posts: 4,783
vCash: 449 |
Winky has fought only four times in more or less two years, quartey, soliman and taylor fights were all unimpressive. sure you could make a case for him winning against taylor, but he didn't. and beating hopkins already makes him #1?
compare that to pac's resume on the same span. morales 2x, larios, and two solid contenders in jorge solis and hector velasquez. |
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,425
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,250
vCash: 1000 |
Boxing fans are in denial, trying to believe that Winky fighting Hopkins at 41 means something. Believe it or not boxers are just like every other athlete and they actually get old. What pisses me off is that when Hopkins/Jones were supposed to fight last yr everyone was going crazy saying is wouldn't mean anything at all but now of a sudden Hopkins/Winky is more meaningful? Go figure...
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|