Khan fight is off! - Page 2

Michael300 · 05-09-2012, 07:30 PM

All joking aside, the fans are the real losers here.

Even those with a dislike of Khan would have to acknowledge that the first fight was pretty good, and the rematch was intriguing. Very disappointing turn of events.

macho_grande · 05-09-2012, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by northbakbren

He didnt fail a test for the first fight so not gunna happen.

Pity the fight is off though.

I've read that he did fail the test before the first fight..... I'm ****ing confused.

gazanta · 05-09-2012, 07:35 PM

Does that mean Broner/Sykes is off aswell

Intrigued by who Khan can target, 30th June could be a big night now with Khan,Groves and Fury all out

liger05 · 05-09-2012, 07:38 PM

If Khan fights on the Pacquiao v Bradley undercard what happens with the tv coverage.

Primetime have the fight but Khan has a deal with Sky?

Sux no rematch but glad nevada declined him a licence. It had to be done.

R.I.P Sky · 05-09-2012, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by northbakbren

He didnt fail a test for the first fight so not gunna happen.

He has admitted being injected for the first time on November 12 2011 though which should really make the first fight a NC. Doubt it though.

R.I.P Sky · 05-09-2012, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liger05

If Khan fights on the Pacquiao v Bradley undercard what happens with the tv coverage.

Primetime have the fight but Khan has a deal with Sky?

The June 9th PPV is a Top Rank show. Khan wont be on it.

JIM KELLY · 05-09-2012, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liger05

If Khan fights on the Pacquiao v Bradley undercard what happens with the tv coverage.

Primetime have the fight but Khan has a deal with Sky?

Sux no rematch but glad nevada declined him a licence. It had to be done.

what? Khan on a top rank undercard? lol

macho_grande · 05-09-2012, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R.I.P Sky

He has admitted being injected for the first time on November 12 2011 though which should really make the first fight a NC. Doubt it though.

If that was the only time Peterson juiced, how would it show up months later?

Id imagine Peterson was on it before the first fight, & on it again for this fight.

liger05 · 05-09-2012, 07:51 PM

Those Sky 'behind the ropes' programmes are cursed.

JIM KELLY · 05-09-2012, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liger05

Those Sky 'behind the ropes' programmes are cursed.

what other fights did they curse?

Marlow · 05-09-2012, 07:58 PM

Chisora/klit?

boranbkk · 05-09-2012, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael300

All joking aside, the fans are the real losers here.

Even those with a dislike of Khan would have to acknowledge that the first fight was pretty good, and the rematch was intriguing. Very disappointing turn of events.

Agree, was really looking forward to this one.

liger05 · 05-09-2012, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIM KELLY

what other fights did they curse?

The Khan v McCloskey one had to be cancelled as well.

Farmboxer · 05-10-2012, 01:48 AM

It so appears as if Peterson cheated in the first fight as well. Did the DC boxing commish cover for Peterson? The referee sure did and so did the judges. What about they mystery man who was illegally talking to the judges? Whatever, I am so disappointed....................Khan would have knocked Peterson out with or without roids! Read that the titles Peterson stole from Khan will become vacant, Khan will fight someone else in June for his titles.....................

doug.ie · 05-10-2012, 02:17 AM

gary sykes must be gutted, he's the one i feel sorry for...so close to his dream, boxing in vegas for a world title....whatever his chances, that was a dream fight for him

05-09-2012, 07:30 PM	#16
Michael300 Fighting back..... ESB Addict Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Up and about Posts: 1,660 vCash: 500	Re: Khan fight is off! All joking aside, the fans are the real losers here. Even those with a dislike of Khan would have to acknowledge that the first fight was pretty good, and the rematch was intriguing. Very disappointing turn of events.
Top

05-09-2012, 07:35 PM	#18
gazanta Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Bolton Posts: 765 vCash: 335	Re: Khan fight is off! Does that mean Broner/Sykes is off aswell Intrigued by who Khan can target, 30th June could be a big night now with Khan,Groves and Fury all out
Top

05-09-2012, 07:38 PM	#19
liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! ESB Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: London, UK Posts: 2,039 vCash: 1000	Re: Khan fight is off! If Khan fights on the Pacquiao v Bradley undercard what happens with the tv coverage. Primetime have the fight but Khan has a deal with Sky? Sux no rematch but glad nevada declined him a licence. It had to be done.
Top

05-09-2012, 07:51 PM	#24
liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! ESB Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: London, UK Posts: 2,039 vCash: 1000	Re: Khan fight is off! Those Sky 'behind the ropes' programmes are cursed.
Top

05-09-2012, 07:58 PM	#26
Marlow Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 1,970 vCash: 960	Re: Khan fight is off! Chisora/klit?
Top

05-10-2012, 01:48 AM	#29
Farmboxer P4P King East Side VIP Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: USA Posts: 27,526 vCash: 1000	Re: Khan fight is off! It so appears as if Peterson cheated in the first fight as well. Did the DC boxing commish cover for Peterson? The referee sure did and so did the judges. What about they mystery man who was illegally talking to the judges? Whatever, I am so disappointed....................Khan would have knocked Peterson out with or without roids! Read that the titles Peterson stole from Khan will become vacant, Khan will fight someone else in June for his titles.....................
Top

05-10-2012, 02:17 AM	#30
doug.ie broadcasting from a shed East Side Guru Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: sligo, ireland Posts: 5,477 vCash: 75	Re: Khan fight is off! gary sykes must be gutted, he's the one i feel sorry for...so close to his dream, boxing in vegas for a world title....whatever his chances, that was a dream fight for him
Top