IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather... - Page 4

slugger3000 · 06-11-2012, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pimp C

I actually follow and know boxing while you don't know shit about it. You're a Pactard of the highest order your job is done here.

If you think Bradley got a draw... well then you don't know shit about boxing fella!!

I know much more about Baaaxing than you or your momma!

slugger3000 · 06-11-2012, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrIxToNbOmBa

bradley sd12...deal wid it...

Yes it was kinda like the Rios-Abril fight... Or Williams-Lara!!

Take your pick... Bradley won because some old man had him winning.. the scores didn't reflect what went on in the ring!

illwill007 · 06-11-2012, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackness

It's that simple.

****in boxing is comedy in 2012.

Nah...its a horror flick.

Thatman · 06-11-2012, 10:21 PM

Bradley had more success with Manny than Cotto with Mayweather.

Marquez beat Manny and was robbed though.

Thatman · 06-11-2012, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slugger3000

Yes it was kinda like the Rios-Abril fight... Or Williams-Lara!!

Take your pick... Bradley won because some old man had him winning.. the scores didn't reflect what went on in the ring!

A lot like Marquez Pacquiao 3.

Thatman · 06-11-2012, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slugger3000

If you think Bradley got a draw... well then you don't know shit about boxing fella!!

I know much more about Baaaxing than you or your momma!

If you think Manny did not lose to Marquez in the 3rd fight then you don't know shit about boxing.

slugger3000 · 06-11-2012, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thatman

A lot like Marquez Pacquiao 3.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thatman

If you think Manny did not lose to Marquez in the 3rd fight then you don't know shit about boxing.

That fight was close but not a robbery!

Gander Tasco · 06-11-2012, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pimp C

I actually follow and know boxing while you don't know shit about it. You're a Pactard of the highest order your job is done here.

You know boxing yet you think Bradly got a draw. That's means your retarded.

Thatman · 06-11-2012, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slugger3000

That fight was close but not a robbery!

Only pactards say that. Everything that is being said about this fight is being said about the Marquez Pacquiao 3 fight at the time.

You may not like it but it's the truth. Manny got his ass beat by Marquez.

No matter how you like at it Manny is 1-1 in his last 2 fights.

He officially beat Marquez but lost to Timmy.

He unofficially lost to Marquez but beat Timmy.

So there goes that.

Pacquiao won something like 9-3.

Marquez won something like 9-3.

Both were robberies man.

Your boy lost either way you want to look at it now deal with it and shut the **** up.

Thatman · 06-11-2012, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander Tasco

You know boxing yet you think Bradly got a draw. That's means your retarded.

Ok well your retarded and know nothing about boxing if you think Pacuiao won against Marquez 3. That fight wasn't even close.

LoRd_inFamousX1 · 06-11-2012, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SJS19

I'm pretty sure it was actually

Bradley W SD

Mayweather win UD

'It's that simple.'

I agree

Royal-T-Bag · 06-11-2012, 11:25 PM

I gave Cotto 3 rounds and gave Bradley 4 rounds......buuuuut the rounds Cotto won were more obvious and clearer wins. All in all they're pretty even.......but boxing is scored on a round by round basis not a damage basis. Bradley made more rounds close than Cotto but Cotto won the rounds he won by bigger margins. Mayweathers offense was much more effective than Pacs, Cotto's offense was more effective than Bradleys. Mayweather was in a real fight, Pac was in a sparring match where he let his foot off the gas.

BoneCollecter · 06-12-2012, 12:24 AM

cotto was way more competitive with mayweather than bradley, cotto was trying to win bradley was trying to survive, mayweather had to step it up to win, manny was taking a rest he had it so in hand, smacking his gloves together and letting bradley hit him to try and make it more interesting.

Marshmallows =) · 06-12-2012, 12:31 AM

Arum said that “if Manny wants a rematch then that’s what we’ll do. We have the right to affect a rematch. It's going to be his call.”

However made it clear that while Pacquiao will be the draw “you have to compensate for the extra money that Bradley will get. In others words Manny will get far more money than Bradley but he’ll have to absorb the extra money we pay Bradley.”

SO WAS IT ALL ALONG BOB???? MANNY GETS A LOWER PURSE NEXT TIME AROUND AND YOU POCKET IT???

[url]********philboxing.com/news/story-71623.html[/url]

make_the_weight · 06-12-2012, 12:36 AM

Cotto was arguably level going into round 9 Bradley was arguably on his was to getting KTFO going into round 1-12

As for his dominance of the later rounds this was because manny took his foot off the pedal and was blatantly carrying Bradley. Bradley was using his weak as jabs and flapping a lot although to his credit he did also have some nice flurries and was more active due to manny's inactivity. I think manny just got bored and lost his killer instinct.

06-11-2012, 10:21 PM	#49
Thatman No respond troll pactards ESB Addict Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 2,873 vCash: 500	Re: IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather... Bradley had more success with Manny than Cotto with Mayweather. Marquez beat Manny and was robbed though.
Top

06-11-2012, 11:25 PM	#57
Royal-T-Bag Undisputed Champion East Side VIP Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 11,238 vCash: 1000	Re: IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather... I gave Cotto 3 rounds and gave Bradley 4 rounds......buuuuut the rounds Cotto won were more obvious and clearer wins. All in all they're pretty even.......but boxing is scored on a round by round basis not a damage basis. Bradley made more rounds close than Cotto but Cotto won the rounds he won by bigger margins. Mayweathers offense was much more effective than Pacs, Cotto's offense was more effective than Bradleys. Mayweather was in a real fight, Pac was in a sparring match where he let his foot off the gas.
Top

06-12-2012, 12:24 AM	#58
BoneCollecter Warrior Poet ESB Full Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Wally World Posts: 397 vCash: 1000	Re: IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather... cotto was way more competitive with mayweather than bradley, cotto was trying to win bradley was trying to survive, mayweather had to step it up to win, manny was taking a rest he had it so in hand, smacking his gloves together and letting bradley hit him to try and make it more interesting.
Top

06-12-2012, 12:31 AM	#59
Marshmallows =) Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,115 vCash: 500	Re: IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather... Arum said that “if Manny wants a rematch then that’s what we’ll do. We have the right to affect a rematch. It's going to be his call.” However made it clear that while Pacquiao will be the draw “you have to compensate for the extra money that Bradley will get. In others words Manny will get far more money than Bradley but he’ll have to absorb the extra money we pay Bradley.” SO WAS IT ALL ALONG BOB???? MANNY GETS A LOWER PURSE NEXT TIME AROUND AND YOU POCKET IT??? [url]********philboxing.com/news/story-71623.html[/url]
Top

06-12-2012, 12:36 AM	#60
make_the_weight Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,507 vCash: 1000	Re: IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather... Cotto was arguably level going into round 9 Bradley was arguably on his was to getting KTFO going into round 1-12 As for his dominance of the later rounds this was because manny took his foot off the pedal and was blatantly carrying Bradley. Bradley was using his weak as jabs and flapping a lot although to his credit he did also have some nice flurries and was more active due to manny's inactivity. I think manny just got bored and lost his killer instinct.
Top