|
|
|
#3 |
|
On permanent vacation
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,094
vCash: 683 |
none but i'd say
charles walcott tunney moore johnson marciano (one of the greatest fighters ever but vs prime tyson is a stylistic nightmare for him) |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Vicious & Malicious
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,838
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Stylistically, I'd give Walcott and Johnson the best chance, because clinching and short, inside punching was a strong point for both. Both defensive, slick guys who can spoil a bit. In the end, they both still probably lose. In order of best chance to worst, I'd say: Johnson Walcott Charles Tunney Marciano Moore |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,590
vCash: 500 |
What I meant to say was CW.. but typed the wrong thing... According to you.. Johnson did he best work at that weight and Marciano was the best CW for you besides Holy I believe... So none of them give Tyson any pause?
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|