Naseem hammed should have been great

HeavyweightCP · 06-27-2012, 01:41 AM

I think he could have been the best featherweight ever with that amazing power.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TesKl_wr8iA[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMo8py9zJRU&feature=related[/ame]

hookfromhell · 06-27-2012, 10:33 AM

He was great, he didnt train properly for Barerra, not like manny
Wanted him too. But yeah great power, speed, defense. H2H
he is a beast.

Azzer85 · 06-27-2012, 11:34 AM

He was another Tyson, who threw away what bought him to the top and relied on a punch to get him through.

Thats all fine until you run into a guy who works that out like MAB, Holyfield etc.

When your Plan A is a homerun punch, your heading for a schooling.

Hamed was on the cusp of greatness IMO, hed still beat alot of guys H2H.

IMO, he knocks Pacqiao out at FW, but thats just my opinion.

hookfromhell · 06-27-2012, 01:04 PM

Hamed relied on reflexes, didnt have solid fundamentals.
Tyson had ultra technical boxing skills and solid fundamentals,
he just didnt have the same level of athleticism or skill after
Serving years in prison. 80s Tyson would have destroyed
any version of Holyfield. Its not that Holyfield had his number
so much as it is that Mikes technique had diminished. Anyway
something of a paradox, perhaps in the same vain as ali, if
Hamed had solid fundamentals he might not have been as good
or dazzling, nevertheless if manny had control of him the
barerra fight could have gone differently. Manny steward is
a genius.

HeavyweightCP · 06-27-2012, 05:24 PM

When he was focused he was a animal and a clown.

Popkins · 06-27-2012, 05:27 PM

Yes, he should have been. If he'd ever bothered to learn how to defend himself or throw a jab or gained any serious grasp of the fundamentals of boxing, he could have been. But that logic so could so many other heavy-handed guys who flopped as soon as they fought genuine top competition.

HeavyweightCP · 06-27-2012, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popkins

Yes, he should have been. If he'd ever bothered to learn how to defend himself or throw a jab or gained any serious grasp of the fundamentals of boxing, he could have been. But that logic so could so many other heavy-handed guys who flopped as soon as they fought genuine top competition.

he did know how to throw a jab listen to what manny steward said about him.

Popkins · 06-27-2012, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeavyweightCP

he did know how to throw a jab listen to what manny steward said about him.

Manny should've told him to do it in his fights then.

HeavyweightCP · 06-27-2012, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popkins

Manny should've told him to do it in his fights then.

He did in the fights before Marco.

But manny said Naz was already on the decline before that fight.

TBooze · 06-27-2012, 06:29 PM

He should have stuck with Ingle...

HeavyweightCP · 06-27-2012, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TBooze

He should have stuck with Ingle...

I think the same thing.

mcvey · 06-27-2012, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeavyweightCP

I think he could have been the best featherweight ever with that amazing power.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Not for me , he was off balance when he missed , not the sign of a great fighter,he was a great puncher ,that is all that was great about him. He also avoided a couple of guys.
He was one guy that really believed he was wonderful, I think he is a wretched human being.

HeavyweightCP · 06-27-2012, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcvey

Not for me , he was off balance when he missed , not the sign of a great fighter,he was a great puncher ,that is all that was great about him. He also avoided a couple of guys.
He was one guy that really believed he was wonderful, I think he is a wretched human being.

Manny stewart even says naz talent was special he ran from nobody buddy.

Boxed Ears · 06-27-2012, 09:30 PM

Speaking as the future heavyweight champion of the world and a twelve-year-old, I'd like to say that Hamed could've been the greatest p4p fighter in the history of the featherweight division during some of his active years and Manny Stewart's surname only has one 't'.

young griffo · 06-27-2012, 10:44 PM

Naseem Hammed should have been great and spelt properly.

06-27-2012, 01:41 AM	#1
HeavyweightCP Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 1,123 vCash: 500	Naseem hammed should have been great I think he could have been the best featherweight ever with that amazing power. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TesKl_wr8iA[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMo8py9zJRU&feature=related[/ame]
Top

06-27-2012, 10:33 AM	#2
hookfromhell Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 861 vCash: 427	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great He was great, he didnt train properly for Barerra, not like manny Wanted him too. But yeah great power, speed, defense. H2H he is a beast.
Top

06-27-2012, 11:34 AM	#3
Azzer85 ATG ESB Addict Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Telford, West Midlands, UK Posts: 4,198 vCash: 500	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great He was another Tyson, who threw away what bought him to the top and relied on a punch to get him through. Thats all fine until you run into a guy who works that out like MAB, Holyfield etc. When your Plan A is a homerun punch, your heading for a schooling. Hamed was on the cusp of greatness IMO, hed still beat alot of guys H2H. IMO, he knocks Pacqiao out at FW, but thats just my opinion.
Top

06-27-2012, 01:04 PM	#4
hookfromhell Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 861 vCash: 427	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great Hamed relied on reflexes, didnt have solid fundamentals. Tyson had ultra technical boxing skills and solid fundamentals, he just didnt have the same level of athleticism or skill after Serving years in prison. 80s Tyson would have destroyed any version of Holyfield. Its not that Holyfield had his number so much as it is that Mikes technique had diminished. Anyway something of a paradox, perhaps in the same vain as ali, if Hamed had solid fundamentals he might not have been as good or dazzling, nevertheless if manny had control of him the barerra fight could have gone differently. Manny steward is a genius.
Top

06-27-2012, 05:24 PM	#5
HeavyweightCP Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 1,123 vCash: 500	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great When he was focused he was a animal and a clown.
Top

06-27-2012, 05:27 PM	#6
Popkins Pacquiao East Side VIP Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: UK Posts: 13,559 vCash: 1000	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great Yes, he should have been. If he'd ever bothered to learn how to defend himself or throw a jab or gained any serious grasp of the fundamentals of boxing, he could have been. But that logic so could so many other heavy-handed guys who flopped as soon as they fought genuine top competition.
Top

06-27-2012, 06:29 PM	#10
TBooze Champion East Side Guru Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: South of London Posts: 9,775 vCash: 1	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great He should have stuck with Ingle...
Top

06-27-2012, 09:30 PM	#14
Boxed Ears Lowering Post Count East Side VIP Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Brunoilia, Hehsland Posts: 51,280 vCash: 7500	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great Speaking as the future heavyweight champion of the world and a twelve-year-old, I'd like to say that Hamed could've been the greatest p4p fighter in the history of the featherweight division during some of his active years and Manny Stewart's surname only has one 't'.
Top

06-27-2012, 10:44 PM	#15
young griffo Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,974 vCash: 1000	Re: Naseem hammed should have been great Naseem Hammed should have been great and spelt properly.
Top