|
|
|
#1 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,024
vCash: 1000 |
I will grant you an on form version of Sharkey for this event.
People say that Sharkey was the best that Dempsey ever beat, but I wonder if that is necessarily true. Could Gibbons have been the champion, if his prime had been during the period between Tunney retiring and Louis grabbing the title? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,716
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,116
vCash: 1000 |
Jack Sharkey was a terror to many light heavyweights. Despite Gibbons's success as a heavyweight, he was always more of a light heavy, especially in his prime. I don't think Gibbons could outpoint the bigger, stronger man who was equally skilled.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,251
vCash: 1000 |
Whilst I think Gibbons was all round better than Sharkey, probably, I think that Sharkey might have his number in the same sort of way that Taylor (kind of) had Hopkins.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,726
vCash: 1000 |
I've only seen Gibbons been dominated by Dempsey. Sharkey was skilled but inconsistent, he usually bested smaller men but ofcourse Walker took him to a draw so could Gibbons? Perhaps
I do think at his best Sharkey would be able to impose his size An odd comparison, do you consider him to have athletic advantages rather than just size and strength on him? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,105
vCash: 1000 |
This would have been a good fight. Probably a very close one to the final bell too. Young Stribling gave Sharkey a close fight and I think Gibbons was a little better than Stribling in most departments.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|